in ,

LOLLOL

Harry Sisson REFUSES To Answer Piers Morgan’s SIMPLE Question!

The young Grifter Got REKT!

Harry Sisson, faced off with Piers Morgan and others in a hilariously cringe-worthy exchange that exposed Sisson's buffoonery

Harry Sisson, a young political commentator, faced off with Piers Morgan, Dave Rubin, and others to discuss President Trump’s executive order recognizing only two genders. What ensued was a hilariously cringe-worthy exchange that exposed Sisson’s inexperience and inability to think on his feet.

Who is Harry Sisson?

Often criticized as a “kid grifter,” Sisson has a social media following on TikTok, X and other platforms. He is known for voicing talking points aligning with the establishment left such as the DNC or other left-leaning thought leaders. Many believe that he is paid or his “influence” through his employer, Palette Media, which the DNC has paid in the past. He recently appeared on Piers Morgan Uncensored where his “performance” earned him mockery and derision from conservatives and intellectuals alike.

“C’mon, Little Man”

On his show, Piers Morgan asked Sisson a relatively simple question: how many genders are there?  

He evaded Morgan’s question, prompting conservative panelists Ben Ferguson and Dave Rubin to pounce on an opportunity to mock Sisson. Eventually, he relented by responding “at least two genders.” This invited Morgan and others to follow up by grilling Sisson to put an exact number on his opinion. After all, if there are “at least two” genders, he could surely nail down a definite number, right? When Sisson could not provide a solid response, the panel began laughing and mocking him.

Cornel West to the Rescue!

Dr. Cornel West, former presidential candidate and political commentator, attempted to help by offering a convoluted answer based on Shakespearean philosophy on the concept of gender. West’s argument, which referenced the idea that everyone is androgynous, only added to the comedy and confusion at hand. Sisson, clearly uncomfortable, rejected West’s assistance, showing his frustration at the growing chaos of the debate.

Analyzing the Buffoonery

Gene Berardelli analyzed both Sisson and West’s responses in the context of his book, Schnooks, Crooks, Liars & Scoundrels. Berardelli critiqued for lacking intellectual depth and their evasive responses. For example, Sisson never discussed any biological or sociological perspectives relevant to the debate. Instead, Sisson acted as if he had all the answers, which only made his poor performance that much more glaring.

On the other hand, West resorted to waxing poetically about Shakespeare with his trademark equivocations. In this respect, West’s torturous contortions diminished his personal credibility.

The Utility of Mocking Sisson

At one point in the video, Sisson complains to Morgan that his adversaries, Rubin and Ferguson, are allowed to be without interruption, while he has to endure Rubin and Ferguson’s mockery. In fact, his main tactic in this segment was to return Rubin and Ferguson’s mockery with insults of his own. This shows the utility of comedic retorts and mockery can be effective in political discourse.

The mockery aimed at Sisson reflects the broader political tensions on display. His failure to engage with Rubin and Ferguson seriously on issues like gender identity shows why Donald Trump won. Typically, voters look for more direct, grounded responses from politicians and commentators. Many may have found Trump’s approach more appealing than a young grifter from TikTok doubling down on past failed strategies.

Pride Goes Before the Fall

Sisson, and others like him, need to improve their ability to engage in political discourse that is neither condescending nor evasive. If Sisson wants others to take him seriously, then he must come prepared with well-thought-out answers rather than relying on scripted talking points and partisan jabs. Until then, folks like Rubin and Ferguson, who possess both requisite knowledge and a sharp wit, will continue to mock and ridicule grifters like Harry Sisson and see more perceived victories in the political arena.

What do you think?

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Loading…

0
CNN's Jim Acosta has an over the top emotional reaction to President Donald Trump's pardons for January 6 (J6) defendants during a recent interview.

Video: Acosta Goes OVER THE TOP in J6 Pardon Interview

Acosta is the latest in a line of CNN hacks l who saw their heyday during the rise and fall of Donald Trump, with only Trump rising again.

Acosta OUT at CNN: Requiem for a Hack